← All initiatives
AI Adoption Initiative · AA-08
Executive AI Alignment & Decision Cadence
ImpactHigh
Complexity2 / 5
AI Adoption Est.$4,500Starting
Most mid-market leadership teams don't have a standing AI governance committee, and they shouldn't need one. What they're usually missing instead is any rhythm at all: no one owns the next decision, two departments fund overlapping pilots without knowing it, and the executive who championed the first project moves on to the next fire before it's finished.
The outcomeLeadership gets a decision rhythm sized to a mid-market team: who owns what, how often value actually gets reviewed, and how the next investment gets sequenced against the last one. AI moves off the side of everyone's desk and onto the same quarterly calendar as the rest of the business.
What you get
- Clear ownership of the next AI decision, not a standing committee nobody has time for
- A working view of every AI initiative in flight, so two teams stop funding the same idea twice
- A review that actually happens each quarter, with real go or no-go calls attached
- A rule for protecting adoption work when a busier week tries to eat the calendar
How we prove it · Your agreed metrics
- Whether the rhythm is written down and leadership actually follows it
- How many AI initiatives have one clear executive owner
- Fewer AI requests competing for the same budget without anyone noticing
- Time leadership spends deciding on AI vs. just reacting to it
Want this running in your business?Book a short call →